This week, Trump has rolled back the ban on the federal government providing surplus military equipment to local police departments that the Obama Administration put in place after the Ferguson backlash.

It might surprise you to learn that this was a measure by Obama that I supported at the time it happened.  Believe it or not, I was disgusted by the Ferguson Police Department’s hamfisted response to the protests that broke out after the Michael Brown shooting and was even initially sympathetic to Black Lives Matter and its cause.  It disappointed me to see that the various militia groups (who usually have their shit together) were uniformly on the side of the police instead of protecting the rights of the protesters.  Remember that this was happening at about the same time as the Bundy Ranch standoff.

Over time, my attitude toward BLM changed.  I lost respect for them because of the Ferguson riots and their application of the obnoxious and dangerous “freeway blocking” protest tactic, among other things.  Even though I think their original cause was a good one, they managed to lose my goodwill by their own conduct.

Still, I was–and remain–leery about militarized police departments.  Not only do I think it’s un-American for police departments to even present the appearance of being an occupying force in our neighborhoods, I find it distressing that some police officers seem to literally think this is the role they should hold.

There are problems I have with modern policing.  I think cops place too much emphasis on “officer safety” at the expense of “public safety”.  No, I don’t want to see police officers die or get hurt for the sake of every crackhead who’s waving a knife around, but I also believe that a society such as ours shouldn’t tolerate law enforcement using extreme force in situations that clearly don’t require it when there’s a good chance that an innocent will be harmed.

I also think that police officers are far too reliant on their firearms and lack confidence in empty hand and conflict resolution techniques.  That they behave this way is not a reflection on the bravery of your average police officer, in my opinion.  Instead, it’s simply the product of the bad doctrine that’s being propagated at police academies all over the country.  They’re being taught that they should not risk injury to themselves at all costs and the doctrine favors this approach in even the most ludicrous circumstances.  They’re taught to fear the people they’re supposed to be serving and protecting.  This is how you end up seeing unarmed people getting gunned down by jumpy cops in routine traffic stops.

I suppose some people might look at the recent civil brawls in places like Charlottesville and Berkeley as examples of why police departments need more advanced weaponry and equipment.  I don’t.  If anything, I think those incidents are more indicative of police departments learning the wrong lessons from Ferguson.  It’s even a byproduct of the “Ferguson Effect”.  The police are terrified to take a hard line against rioters because they’re afraid of how they’ll look when video gets uploaded to YouTube by witnesses and rioters.   They’ve foolishly gone to the opposite extreme and seem to be content to allow all hell to break loose through inaction rather than risk bad publicity through over-reaction.  This approach is wrong too, of course, and giving them infantry fighting vehicles isn’t going to make it better.

Above all else, any police officer who is so afraid of the community in which he patrols that he thinks he needs a tank should find another career.  The president shouldn’t be feeding this attitude, but he’s made being “tough on crime” due to fear about the perceptions of increasing violent crime a centerpiece of his presidency.

Police departments do not need better toys.  They need better rules.

newest oldest
Notify of
Judge dredd, pro se

I agree here with you. Placing a priority on vets applying to be cops is also a practice that I believe should be abolished. I think combat experience is preferred because many municipalities believe that these potential cops have experience under fire and providing security in hostile situations, but with manny of these interactions go public with cell phone cameras what we are actually seeing are the police creating highly stressful situations going in guns drawn and barking orders at civilians. In all the situations you use to bolster your argument I think there’s two that need to be discussed… Read more »

Part of the problem is also manpower, police departments are having a hard time retaining good cops or getting qualified new recruits, so you wind up with people who shouldn’t be wearing badges or good cops pushed to their limits. Too many are quitting or in some cases taking their own lives. Also, police work is different than the military-cops aren’t soldiers although a lot of cops are veterans. The police are and should clearly remain civilian by nature.


Over time, my attitude toward BLM changed. I lost respect for them because of the Ferguson riots and their application of the obnoxious and dangerous “freeway blocking” protest tactic, among other things. Even though I think their original cause was a good one, they managed to lose my goodwill by their own conduct. I never had respect for them because Michael Brown was a thug who deserved to get shot for his actions. Anyone who still claims Michael Brown is a martyr to police brutality is an ignorant jackass (not saying you are). They’re being taught that they should not… Read more »


I asked him if he lived in our town and he promptly buttoned up. “No, sir! I would never live in the same city where I’m a police officer. Too much trouble.” He was pretty adamant about it. I was surprised by that. Both by what he said and his demeanor about it. … Right. So what bothered me about the interaction with the officer was that it was clear to me that he was afraid of the community he patrols. Couldn’t even live among us as a bunch of middle class white Republicans. I wasn’t there (obviously), but is… Read more »

%d bloggers like this: